Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Demoore Gray v. Ryan Russell, et al
as 20-16702
Defendant / Appellee:
CATES, CO IV, unknown officer employed at Arizona Dept. of Corrections "Safford Unit," in her official capacity, HENRY ABULARACH, Mr., UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as 4 unknown Scottsdale Police Officers, in both their official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMOORE T. GRAY
Fire & Police Pension Associat, et al v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al
as 20-15898
Defendant / Appellee:
MACKEY J. MCDONALD, CYNTHIA H. MILLIGAN, JOHN D. BAKER II and others
Appellant:
EDWARD W. COCHRAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE CITY OF BIRMINGHAM RETIREMENT AND RELIEF SYSTEM and FIRE & POLICE PENSION ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO
Not Classified By Court:
In re: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Fire & Police Pension Associat, et al v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al
as 20-15879
Defendant / Appellee:
MACKEY J. MCDONALD, CYNTHIA H. MILLIGAN, JOHN D. BAKER II and others
Appellant:
CATHY LEBENDIG
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE CITY OF BIRMINGHAM RETIREMENT AND RELIEF SYSTEM and FIRE & POLICE PENSION ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO
Not Classified By Court:
In re: WELLS FARGO & COMPANY SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Demoore Gray v. Ryan Russell, et al
as 20-15632
Defendant / Appellee:
CATES, CO IV, unknown officer employed at Arizona Dept. of Corrections "Safford Unit," in her official capacity, STATE OF ARIZONA, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as 4 unknown Scottsdale Police Officers, in both their official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMOORE T. GRAY
William Moore v. USDC-WAWTA
as 17-73182
:
In re: WILLIAM G. MOORE
Petitioner:
WILLIAM G. MOORE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, TACOMA
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
William Moore v. USDCTAC
as 09-70347
:
In re: WILLIAM G. MOORE
Petitioner:
WILLIAM G. MOORE
Respondent:
USDC, TACOMA
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
