Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Debbie Thompson v. U.S. Bank, N.A., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16376
Defendant / Appellee: CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY, MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP, QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEBBIE ALICE THOMPSON
Pablo Castellanos, et al v. US Bank, N.A., et al
as 20-15659
Plaintiff / Appellant: JUDITH T. CASTELLANOS, Occupants and Parties-In-Possession and PABLO A. CASTELLANOS
Defendant / Appellee: UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as Does 1-100 and ABC Corporations, US BANK, N.A., trustee of LaSalle Bank National Association on behalf of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2007-HE3 on behalf of Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2007-HE3 and ENCORE CREDIT CORPORATION, its assignees and/or successor-in-interest
Pablo Castellanos, et al v. MERS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-15660
Defendant / Appellee: QUALITY LOAN SERVICING CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY, BANK OF AMERICA, NA, named as Bank of America, National Association as Successor by Merger to LaSale Bank National Association, as Trustee for Certificate Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities ILLC, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-HE, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: PABLO A. CASTELLANOS and JUDITH T. CASTELLANOS, Occupants and Parties-In-Possession
Defendant: ENCORE CREDIT CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Natache Rinegard-Guirma v. USDC-ORP
as 19-72906
Not Yet Classified: LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated ss of August 1, 2006 and GSAMP TRUST 2006 HE5, (Defendat 1) and all person unknown, claiming and legal or equitable right, title, or interest in the property described in the Complaint adverse to Plaintiff's title, or any Cloud on Plaintoff's title
Not Classified By Court: In re: NATACHE D. RINEGARD-GUIRMA
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Petitioner: NATACHE D. RINEGARD-GUIRMA
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Saticoy Bay LLC Series 1915
as 19-16648
Defendant / Appellant: SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 1915 AUTUMN SAGE
Plaintiff / Appellee: U.S. BANK, N.A., as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Bank of America, National Association, as Trustee (Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank National Association) as Trustee for Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-7 agent of Bank of America, Nati
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, et al
as 19-15491
Defendant: TERRA WEST COLLECTIONS GROUP, LLC and TAPESTRY AT TOWN CENTER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellant: SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee: U.S. BANK, N.A., as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Bank of America, National Association, as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank, National Association, as Trustee for GSAA Home Equity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-55676
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: James Krage v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al
as 16-56406
Debtor: In the Matter of: JAMES ARTHUR KRAGE
Appellant: JAMES ARTHUR KRAGE
Appellee: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for Certificiate holders of Bear Stearns asset backed Securities I LLC, asset-backed certificates, series 2005-HE9, its Successors and/or assigns, EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, BEAR STEARNS, Asset Backed Securities I LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-55844
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Richard Gale v. USDCLV
as 09-73347
: In re: RICHARD S. GALE
Petitioner: RICHARD S. GALE
Respondent: USDC, LAS VEGAS
Real Party In Interest: FIRST FRANKLIN LOAN SERVICES, FIRST FRANKLIN, MORTAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?