Cases 1 - 10 of 18
LULAC, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 17-71636
Petitioner:
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, PESTICIDE ACTION NETWORK NORTH AMERICA, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
Respondent:
ANDREW WHEELER, Administrator of United States Environmental Protection Agency, SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator of United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor:
STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL., STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Amicus Curiae:
DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC, MIGRANT CLINICIANS NETWORK, HEALTH PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS and others
State of California, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 19-17480
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW WHEELER, Acting Aministrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW MEXICO and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant:
E. SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator, U.S. EPA
Columbia Riverkeeper, et al v. Scott Pruitt, et al
as 19-35033
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, IDAHO RIVERS UNITED, THE INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES and others
Town of Florence, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 17-73170
Petitioner:
TOWN OF FLORENCE, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona and SWVP-GTIS MR, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and ALEXIS STRAUSS, Acting Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9
Intervenor:
FLORENCE COPPER, INC.
Town of Florence, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 17-73168
Petitioner:
TOWN OF FLORENCE, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona and SWVP-GTIS MR, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, SCOTT PRUITT, administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and ALEXIS STRAUSS, Acting Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9
Intervenor:
FLORENCE COPPER, INC.
Safer Chem Healthy Families, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 17-73390
Petitioner:
SAFER CHEMICALS HEALTHY FAMILIES, ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION ON TOXICS, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH STRATEGY CENTER and others
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
EDF v. USEPA, et al
as 17-73383
Petitioner:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND
Intervenor:
AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL, AMERICAN COATINGS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN COKE AND COAL CHEMICALS INSTITUTE and others
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Town of Florence, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 17-73170
Petitioner:
TOWN OF FLORENCE, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona and SWVP-GTIS MR, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and ALEXIS STRAUSS, Acting Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9
Town of Florence, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 17-73168
Petitioner:
TOWN OF FLORENCE, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona and SWVP-GTIS MR, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, SCOTT PRUITT, administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and ALEXIS STRAUSS, Acting Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 9
EDF v. USEPA, et al
as 17-72501
Petitioner:
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
