Cases 1 - 6 of 6
William Wallace, II v. Department of Corrections and, et al
as 20-55570
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANCO, Correctional Officer, individual, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, UNKNOWN, individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff:
KENDRIC CHRISTIAN JOHNSON, CRAIG DENNY MILLER, Jr. and SCOTT ALLEN HAAG
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM JAMES MATHEW WALLACE II
Andrew Clay, et al v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc, et al
as 20-35465
Defendant / Appellee:
HILTON MANAGEMENT SERVICES (CIS), LLC, a Delaware corporation, DBA Hilton Management Services, JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-5; currently unknown individuals, HILTON INTERNATIONAL (THAILAND) CO LTD, a Thailand company/corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONJA CLAY, husband and wife and ANDREW MAXWELL CLAY
William Wallace, II, et al v. Department of Corrections and, et al
as 20-55519
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, UNKNOWN, individual and official capacities, URIBE, Mr., Correctional Officer, in individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM JAMES MATHEW WALLACE II
Christopher Lancaster v. USDC-CARIV
as 17-73003
:
In re: CHRISTOPHER LANCASTER
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER LANCASTER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Real Party In Interest:
UNKNOWN MALE NURSE, individual & official capacity, PRICE, individual, PRICE, Nurse-official capacity and others
Northern Arapaho Tribe v. Darryl LaCounte, et al
as 17-35662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORTHERN ARAPAHO TRIBE, for itself and as parens patriae
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRYL LACOUNTE, LOUISE REYES, NORMA GOURNEAU and others
Northern Arapaho Tribe v. Darryl LaCounte, et al
as 16-36049
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NORTHERN ARAPAHO TRIBE, for itself and as parens patriae
Defendant - Appellant:
DARRYL LACOUNTE, LOUISE REYES, NORMA GOURNEAU and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
