Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Majid Alfarag v. USPS, et al
as 23-35602
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAJID ALFARAG
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Lakewood, Washington Store, USPS CONSUMER AND INDUSTRY CONTACT OFFICE and USPS OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Kimberly Davis, et al v. USA, et al
as 23-55701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIMBERLY DAVIS and EBONY CHAPPELL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and KAILONI ANGELIQUE BROWN
William Viray, et al v. USPS, et al
as 22-16387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM CASTANARES VIRAY
Plaintiff:
NATIVIDAD NAVARRO VIRAY, deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, KAISER PERMANENTE and STEPHEN MERRITT RAFFLE
Rosario Rodriguez v. USA, et al
as 18-56074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSARIO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and DOES, 1-10, inclusive
Lucie Wiggins v. USPS
as 18-55743
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUCIE WIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Wendy Hastings v. USPS, et al
as 17-56643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WENDY HASTINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Anthony San Nicolas v. USPS, et al
as 12-15610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY B. SAN NICOLAS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and PATRICK R. DONAHUE, Postmaster General
Jessica Seymour v. DOD, et al
as 11-55443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSICA SEYMOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
James Elder v. John Potter
as 08-55379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ELDER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General United States Postal Service
Bartolome, et al v. USA, et al
as 08-55233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
D. BRIAN F. BARTOLOME
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER FORD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE US GOVERNMENT and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
