Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Christina Greenfield v. City of Post Falls Municipalit, et al
as 14-35394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTINA J. GREENFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF POST FALLS MUNICIPALITY, CLAYTON R. LARKIN, Mayor, JIM HAMMOND, Preceding Administrator and others
Mykal Ryan v. Timothy Hyden, et al
as 14-55639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MYKAL S. RYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY M. HYDEN, a California resident and as Trustee of the John and Christy Ryan Family Trust, MATTHEW S. TOTH, a California resident and as attorney for the John and Christy Ryan Family Trust and as attorney for Christy Babbitt, PEDDLER, HESSELTINE, WALKER & TOTH L.L.P., a California limited liability partnership and others
Dolores Mandrigues, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
as 13-17234
:
In re: WACHOVIA CORP. "PICK-A-PAYMENT" MORTGAGE MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOLORES MANDRIGUES, JUANITA JONES, AL F. MINYEN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, successor to by merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, NA, FKA Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, FKA World Savings Bank, FSB
Real-party-in-interest - Appellee:
CHAN PHARN, CHRISTINA ZAKO, PAUL MCDERMED and others
Helen Ryan v. Timothy Hyden, et al
as 13-55832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HELEN E. RYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY M. HYDEN, a California resident and as Trustee of the John and Christy Ryan Family Trust, MATTHEW S. TOTH, a California resident and as Attorney for the John and Christy Ryan Family Trust and as Attorney for Christine Babbitt, PEDDER, HESSELTINE, WALKER & TOTH LLP, a California limited liability partnership and others
Estate of John James Ryan v. Timothy Hyden, et al
as 13-55538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTATE OF JOHN JAMES RYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY M. HYDEN, a California resident and as Trustee of the John and Christy Ryan Family Trust, MATTHEW S. TOTH, PEDDER, HESSELTINE, WALKER & TOTH L.L.P., a California Limited Liability Partnership and others
Georgina Abrams v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, et al
as 12-16318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGINA ABRAMS
Receiver - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA, Acquirer of certain assets and liabilities of Washington Mutual Bank from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, VALLEY BANK, BANK OF AMERICA and others
Nathaniel Dayton, et al v. World Savings, Inc., et al
as 11-16510
:
In re: WACHOVIA CORP. "PICK-A-PAYMENT" MORTGAGE MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOLORES MANDRIGUES, JUANITA JONES, AL F. MINYEN and others
Objector - Appellant:
NATHANIEL C. DAYTON, STEPHEN B. FINE and ARIEL BROOKMAN FINE
Defendant - Appellee:
WORLD SAVINGS, INC., WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB, WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB, AKA Wachovia Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Donald Smith, et al v. World Savings, Inc., et al
as 11-16513
:
In re: WACHOVIA CORP. "PICK-A-PAYMENT" MORTGAGE MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOLORES MANDRIGUES, JUANITA JONES, AL F. MINYEN and others
Objector - Appellant:
DONALD SMITH, JAMES RUDOLPH, ROBERT E. FLORES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WORLD SAVINGS, INC., WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB, WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB, AKA Wachovia Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Marcella Rose, et al v. World Savings, Inc., et al
as 11-16507
:
In re: WACHOVIA CORP. "PICK-A-PAYMENT" MORTGAGE MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOLORES MANDRIGUES, JUANITA JONES, AL F. MINYEN and others
Objector - Appellant:
MARCELLA M. ROSE
Defendant - Appellee:
WORLD SAVINGS, INC., WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB, WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB, AKA Wachovia Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Elisabeth Detelder-Collins, et al v. Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, et al
as 10-55498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELISABETH J. DETELDER-COLLINS and JOHN COLLINS
Defendant - Appellee:
WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB, FKA World Savings Bank and WORLD SAVINGS BANK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
