Cases 141 - 150 of 29,233
USA v. Nolan Strauss
as 23-35470
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NOLAN LEVI STRAUSS
Joseph Ochoa v. Ron Broomfield, et al
as 23-15836
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH OCHOA, Administrative Law Judge and JOSEPH OCHOA
Respondent / Appellee:
TAMMY L. CAMPBELL, Warden, California State Prison, Corcoran, California, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and RON BROOMFIELD, Warden, California State Prison, Corcoran, California
Salvador Castro v. T. Cisneros
as 23-15993
Petitioner / Appellant:
SALVADOR ALEXANDER CASTRO
Respondent / Appellee:
T. CISNEROS
John Nieto v. Gordon, et al
as 23-15788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MOISES NIETO
Defendant / Appellee:
GORDON, Warden, YORK, DIAZ-NAVARRO and others
Easton Murray, et al v. Arizona, State of, et al
as 23-15791
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EASTON MURRAY
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIUS MURRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA, STATE OF, PIMA, COUNTY OF, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, named as Office of the District Attorney and others
Tomas Alvarado v. Ryan Blackhawk, et al
as 23-35334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOMAS ALVARADO, AKA Thomas Alvarado
Defendant / Appellee:
RYAN T. BLACKHAWK, JOHN KEMPE, Detective and TRAVIS NALDER
Troy Kelley v. David Brewer
as 23-15801
Petitioner / Appellant:
TROY X. KELLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID BREWER, Warden
Carlos Ruiz v. NDOC, et al
as 23-15781
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS RUIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROMEO ARANAS, KIM ADAMSON and others
James Ricalls v. R. Smith
as 23-15771
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LEONARD RICALLS
Defendant / Appellee:
R. SMITH
Odece Hill v. Attorney General for the State of Arizona, et al
as 23-15798
Petitioner / Appellant:
ODECE DEMPSEAN HILL
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
