Cases 11 - 20 of 538
Jerome Pringle v. Ryan Thornell, et al
as 23-15743
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEROME LEE PRINGLE
Respondent / Appellee:
RYAN THORNELL and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Rafael Pulido Quiroz v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15735
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAFAEL PULIDO QUIROZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
William Stedcke v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15703
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM R. STEDCKE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Benny Gibson v. James Kimble, et al
as 23-15655
Petitioner / Appellant:
BENNY DAVID GIBSON
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES KIMBLE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent:
STATE OF ARIZONA
Danny Morris v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15573
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANNY RAY MORRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Tony Deng v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15529
Petitioner / Appellant:
TONY DENG
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Jeremy Koons v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15517
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEREMY LEE KOONS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, named as The Attorney General of the State of: Arizona
Michael Fuqua v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15498
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent:
UNKNOWN PARTY
Wade Limehouse v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15390
Petitioner / Appellant:
WADE AARON LIMEHOUSE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Michael McKerlie v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15332
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAM MCKERLIE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
