Cases 51 - 60 of 538
Ronald Brown v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16089
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD LE LAWRENCE BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Joseph Carter v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16057
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH GEORGE CARTER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Joseph Carter v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16059
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH GEORGE CARTER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Timothy Owens v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16043
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY KEVIN OWENS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Matthew Cordova v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16048
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW ALEJANO CORDOVA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Steven Burgess v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16030
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN BURGESS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Arlandis Wesley v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16032
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARLANDIS WESLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Leonardo Chavez v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16025
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEONARDO CHAVEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Jonathan Sosnowicz v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16019
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEIGH SOSNOWICZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Steven Bernal v. Edwin Jensen, et al
as 22-16005
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN THOMAS BERNAL
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWIN JENSEN, Warden, Arizona State Prison Complex - Yuma
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
