Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 71 - 80 of 87
Rex Chappell v. D. McCargar, et al
as 09-16984
Plaintiff - Appellant: REX CHAPPELL
Defendant - Appellee: D. MCCARGAR, D. HOFFMAN, Supervisor of Academic Instruction, M. MARTEL, Captian and others
Nicolas Andreas v. James Yates, et al
as 09-16920
Plaintiff - Appellant: NICOLAS DAVID ANDREAS
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES YATES, A. MILLS, P. MENDOZA and others
Marc Sterr v. D. Baptista, et al
as 09-16773
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARC A. STERR
Defendant - Appellee: D. BAPTISTA, S. BARHAM, IMAN MUHAMAD and others
Michael Riskin v. M. Martel, et al
as 09-16641
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL A. RISKIN
Respondent - Appellee: M. MARTEL and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Carlos Damian v. M. Martel
as 09-56078
Petitioner - Appellant: CARLOS DAMIAN
Respondent - Appellee: M. MARTEL
Charles Williams, Jr. v. M. Martel, et al
as 09-16012
Petitioner - Appellant: CHARLES DAVID WILLIAMS, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee: M. MARTEL, Warden, Mule Creek State Prison and MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Alberto Fernandez v. M. Martel, et al
as 09-55634
Petitioner - Appellant: ALBERTO FERNANDEZ
Respondent - Appellee: M. MARTEL, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Lawrence Remsen v. Attorney General of the State, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-15756
Petitioner - Appellant: LAWRENCE REMSEN
Respondent - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, JAMES E. TILTON, JAMES DAVIS and others
Anthony Sharp v. M. Martel, et al
as 09-55536
Petitioner - Appellant: ANTHONY ANDRE SHARP
Respondent - Appellee: M. MARTEL, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, M. MONTEL, Warden and others
Kenneth Marinos v. M. Martel
as 09-55110
Petitioner - Appellant: KENNETH NOEL MARINOS
Respondent - Appellee: M. MARTEL, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?