Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Darnell McGary v. Mark Linquist, et al
as 23-35347
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARNELL OTIS MCGARY
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK LINQUIST and ROBERT W. FERGUSON
Otis Rodgers v. State of California
as 18-55340
Petitioner - Appellant:
OTIS LEE RODGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Otis Thomas v. Michael Mattox, et al
as 17-56916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OTIS MICHAEL THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MATTOX, Sgt.; No. 3373, in official capacity, JUSTIN EISENBERG, Captain, in official capacity, MARTIN BLAND, Senior Management Analyst, Official Capacity and others
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Jamilah Jefferson, et al
as 17-16040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMILAH A. JEFFERSON, OTIS JR. MCGEE and CITY OF OAKLAND
Otis Harris, III v. USA, et al
as 17-55451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OTIS HARRIS III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RICHARD GROSS, Clinical Director, FCI-Lompoc-Low, individual/official capacity, DEAN WONG, Correctional Officer, individual/official capacity and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GAROD GARRISON, Case Manager Coordinator (CMC), individual/official capacity and UMMA SUKHAVAIS, Medical Doctor, Federal Correctional Complex-Beaumont, TX, individual/official capacity
Otis Hart v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 17-55335
Petitioner - Appellant:
OTIS HART
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, Secretary of the CDCR and CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER
USA v. Otis Mobley
as 16-17241
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
OTIS MOBLEY
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Jamilah Jefferson, et al
as 16-16657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMILAH A. JEFFERSON, OTIS JR. MCGEE and CITY OF OAKLAND
Otis Vann, Jr. v. Kamala Harri
as 16-56341
Petitioner - Appellant:
OTIS VANN, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General
Otis Ervin v. Soto
as 14-56595
Petitioner - Appellant:
OTIS FITZGERALD ERVIN
Respondent - Appellee:
SOTO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
