Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Vincent Bruce v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 12-15982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT C. BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, RICHARD A. RIMMER, M. RUFF and others
Byron Johnson v. David Runnels, et al
as 11-16697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON EUGENE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID L. RUNNELS, RODERICK HICKMAN, Youth and Adult Correctional Secretary, RICHARD A. RIMMER, Former Director of CDC and others
Robert Bond v. Richard Rimmer, et al
as 11-16061
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT LOREN BOND
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD A. RIMMER and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Byron Johnson v. David Runnels, et al
as 11-16058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON EUGENE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID L. RUNNELS, RODERICK HICKMAN, Youth and Adult Correctional Secretary, RICHARD RIMMER, Former Director of CDC and others
Hulen Harrell v. P. Palmer, et al
as 11-15500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HULEN T. HARRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
P. D. PALMER, CDC Captain, POPOVICH, Lieutenant, B C ADAMS, Facility 1 Captain and others
Jesus Maravilla v. Richard Rimmer, et al
as 09-56105
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESUS MARAVILLA
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD RIMMER, Director, Department of Corrections and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Harry Williby v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 08-17449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY J. WILLIBY
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, TOM L. CAREY, EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr. and others
Edward Jones v. Richard Rimmer, et al
as 08-56798
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD C. JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD A. RIMMER, Acting Dirctor of the CA Dept. of Corrections and JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director of California Department of Corrections
Eric Charles Knapp v. C. M. Harrison, et al
as 08-56629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K'NAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
C. M. HARRISON, ALLEN, ALVARADO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
