Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 101 - 110 of 245
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Susan Skalski, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-16948
Plaintiff - Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE and CALIFORNIA CHAPPARAL INSTITUTE
Defendant - Appellee: SUSAN SKALSKI, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Stanislaus National Forest and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the Department of Agriculture
Intervenor-Defendant: TUOLUMNE COUNTY, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, CALIFORNIA FORESTRY ASSOCIATION and others
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Paul Bradford, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-35786
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant - Appellee: PAUL BRADFORD, Kootenai National Forest Supervisor, FAYE KRUEGER, Regional Forester of Region One of the U.S. Forest Service, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and others
League of Wilderness Defenders v. USFS, et al
as 14-35683
Plaintiff - Appellee: LEAGUE OF WILDERNESS DEFENDERS/BLUE MOUNTAINS BIODIVERSITY PROJECT, an Oregon nonprofit corporation
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and KENT CONNAUGHTON, Regional Forester, Pacific Northwest Region of the Forest Service, in his official capacity
David Everist v. United States Department of Ag, et al
as 14-35661
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID D. EVERIST
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE, DONNA MICKLEY, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-16395
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Swan View Coalition, et al v. Chip Weber, et al
as 14-35593
Plaintiff - Appellant: SWAN VIEW COALITION, FRIENDS OF THE WILD SWAN, NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL and others
Defendant - Appellee: CHIP WEBER, Flathead National Forest Supervisor, FAYE KRUEGER, Regional Forester of Region One of the U.S. Forest Service, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and others
Native Ecosystems Council, et al v. Faye Krueger, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-35518
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL, a non-profit organization and ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, a non-profit organization
Defendant - Appellee: FAYE KRUEGER, in her official capacity as Regional Forester for the United States Forest Service, Region One, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Interior
Robert Luciano, Jr. v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-16167
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT A. LUCIANO, Jr., Trustee of The Robert A. Luciano Jr. Revocable Trust Dated February 27, 1995
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, TOM VILSACK, Secretary of Agriculture and others
Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. USFS
as 14-35471
Plaintiff - Appellee: GREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an administrative agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
Friends of the Wild Swan, et al v. Tim Garcia, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-35463
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRIENDS OF THE WILD SWAN, a non-profit organization, ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, a non-profit organization, MONTANA ECOSYSTEMS DEFENSE COUNCIL, a non-profit organization and others
Defendant - Appellee: TIM GARCIA, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Lolo National Forest, FAYE KRUEGER, in her official capacity as Regional Forester for the United States Forest Service, Region One, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?