Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 111 - 120 of 1,597
Stephen Malloy v. USDC-CAOAK, et alIn re: Stephen Malloy v. USDC-CAOAK, et al
as 22-70253
Not Classified By Court: In re: STEPHEN MALLOY, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MARY-ANN HAIRSTON, UCOP Dir. Employee Relations and others
Petitioner: STEPHEN MALLOY
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16776
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
USA v. Anthony Sanchez We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-10282
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ANTHONY BUZIO SANCHEZ
Diaz-Jimenez, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1785
Petitioner: ANA MARIA DIAZ-JIMENEZ and ERICKA STEFANIA SANCHEZ-DIAZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Birrueta Sanchez, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1720
Petitioner: ALBERTO BIRRUETA SANCHEZ, ADOLFINA SUAREZ MARTINEZ, MARIBELLA BIRRUETA SUAREZ and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanchez-Argueta v. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1685
Petitioner: REYNA ESMERALDA SANCHEZ-ARGUETA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bernardo Sanchez v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 22-55911
Plaintiff / Appellant: BERNARDO SANCHEZ
Defendant / Appellee: HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Sanchez-Suazo, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1605
Petitioner: DIASIS YAMILET SANCHEZ-SUAZO and LUIS DAVID MUNOZ-SANCHEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vargas Sanchez v. Garland
as 22-1584
Petitioner: JESSICA YUNUEN VARGAS SANCHEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanchez Linares v. Garland
as 22-1586
Petitioner: JAVIER SANCHEZ LINARES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?