Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Ying Chen v. William Barr
as 19-70084
Petitioner:
YING CHEN
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Yingqing Chen v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-72392
Petitioner:
YINGQING CHEN, AKA Ying Qing Chen
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Ying Li v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71322
Petitioner:
YING LI
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Ying Yip v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-70573
Petitioner:
YING LOONG YIP, AKA Yingloong Yip
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Rubicon Global Ventures, Inc., et al v. Chongquing Zongshen Group Impo, et al
as 17-35601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBICON GLOBAL VENTURES, INC., an Oregon corporation and Z MOTORS, INC., an Oregon corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
CHONGQUING ZONGSHEN GROUP IMPORT/EXPORT CORP., a foreign corporation, CHONGQING ZONGSHEN GROUP, a foreign corporation, ZONGSHEN INDUSTRIAL GROUP, a foreign corporation and others
Ying Lin v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-72058
Petitioner:
YING FENG LIN
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Salma Merritt, et al v. City of Sunnyvale, et al
as 17-15771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALMA MERRITT and DAVID MERRITT, pro se
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SUNNYVALE, ROSEMARIE ZULUETA, TRUDI RYAN and others
Ying Liu v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-74033
Petitioner:
YING LIU
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Salma Merritt, et al v. City of Sunnyvale, et al
as 16-16888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALMA MERRITT and DAVID MERRITT, pro se
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SUNNYVALE, ROSEMARIE ZULUETA, TRUDI RYAN and others
Jun-En Enterprises, et al v. Peter Lin, et al
as 14-56621
Appellant:
HOW GUIN ROBERT FONG
Plaintiff-counter-defendant:
SHI RU YANG, JUN-EN ENTERPRISE, a Taiwan corporation and AGAPE INDUSTRY CO., LTD, a Taiwan corporation
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
PETER K. LIN and AGAPE INDUSTRIAL, INC.
Third-party-defendant:
SHIU-YING LU
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
