Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Jerry Dillingham v. F. Garcia, et al
as 20-15016
Defendant:
S. SHERMAN, S. SMITH, J. ABBOTT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY KENT DILLINGHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
F. GARCIA
Richard Evans v. K. Siebel, et al
as 19-17574
Defendant / Appellee:
K. SIEBEL, S. SHERMAN, S. GARCIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD A. EVANS
Jose Gomez v. S. Sherman
as 19-17582
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE VICTOR GOMEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
S. SHERMAN, Warden
Felton Humphries, Jr. v. S. Sherman
as 19-55825
Petitioner / Appellant:
FELTON LADELL HUMPHRIES, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
S. SHERMAN, Warden
Jose Espinoza v. S. Sherman
as 16-16382
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE A. ESPINOZA
Respondent - Appellee:
S. SHERMAN
Ronald Martinez v. Kathleen Allison, et al
as 14-16880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD F. MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden, Warden Acting at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (CSATF), KENT CLARK, Warden of California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (CSATF), WILLIAM J. SULLIVAN, Associate Director of General Population (Sacramento) and others
Francis Davis v. Lloyd, et al
as 12-17218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS W. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
LLOYD, C/O, S. SHERMAN, CLARK and others
Gregorio Funtanilla, Jr. v. R. Gomez, et al
as 10-15292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORIO C. FUNTANILLA, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
R. GOMEZ, D. ADAMS, R. HALL and others
Ernestine Young, et al v. City and County of Honolulu
as 09-16034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNESTINE CHING YOUNG, individually, ERNESTINE C. YOUNG, Trustee of the Wallace L. Young Trust dated April 12, 2005 (Residuary Trust), JAMES M. SHERMAN, AKA James Malcolm Sherman and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU
Michael Hughes v. S. Sherman, et al
as 08-17215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. HUGHES
Defendant - Appellee:
S. SHERMAN, Associate Warden, C R VILLARRIAL, C/O, W R VILLARREAL, Lt. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
