Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Allan Parmelee v. Shirley Clark, et al
as 13-35792
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALLAN PARMALEE
Defendant - Appellee: SHIRLEY CLARK, KERRI ROBINSON, JAY JACKSON and others
Steven McDonald v. James Edwards, et al
as 13-35732
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEVEN DARBY MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES EDWARDS, M.D., Medical Director, WSP, F. JOHN SMITH, M.D., Physician, WSP, G. PIERCE, Disciplinary Hearings Examiner, WSP and others
James Barstad v. Department of Corrections Stat, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-35338
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES BENJAMIN BARSTAD
Defendant - Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE OF WASHINGTON, BERNARD EDWARD WARNER, DAN PACHOLKE and others
Robert Johnson v. Steven Sager, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-35255
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT E. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee: STEVEN SAGER, TRU Counselor, MICHAEL SILVA, TRU Sgt., JANET BUSBY, TRU - CUS and others
Luis Camejo-Rodriguez v. MCC Supt Margaret Gilbert, et al
as 13-35111
Plaintiff - Appellant: LUIS A CAMEJO-RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee: MCC SUPT MARGARET GILBERT, SCOTT FRAKES, BERNARD WARNER, COG HQ and others
Eric Christensen v. Scott Frake
as 12-35715
Petitioner - Appellant: ERIC FRANCIS CHRISTENSEN
Respondent - Appellee: SCOTT FRAKES
Randy Smith v. Scott Frake
as 12-35651
Petitioner - Appellant: RANDY SMITH
Respondent - Appellee: SCOTT FRAKES
Ronald Smith v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 12-16486
Petitioner - Appellant: RONALD V. SMITH
Respondent - Appellee: KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General and SCOTT FRAKES
Marvin Krona v. Scott Frake
as 12-35151
Petitioner - Appellant: MARVIN KRONA
Respondent - Appellee: SCOTT FRAKES
Marvin Krona v. Scott Frake
as 11-36066
Petitioner - Appellant: MARVIN KRONA
Respondent - Appellee: SCOTT FRAKES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?