Cases 11 - 20 of 21
David Troupe v. Donna Smith, et al
as 16-35857
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID TROUPE
Defendant - Appellee:
DONNA SMITH, SCOTT RUSSELL, ERIC WIRT and others
Lavelle Mitchell v. State of Washington, et al
as 14-35800
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAVELLE XAVIER MITCHELL
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, WASHINGTON CORRECTIONS CENTER and SCOTT RUSSELL, Superintendent
Cullen Hankerson v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 13-36160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CULLEN M. HANKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BERNIE WARNER, ROBERT MCKENNA and others
Scott Smith v. Washington Department of Corre, et al
as 13-36064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT C. SMITH, AKA Scott Isamu Michio Kikuchi
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
James Hinkley v. Scott Russell, et al
as 13-35973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MARK HINKLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT RUSSELL, KERRY ARLOW, JEFF CARLSEN and others
Joel Holmes v. Scott Russell, et al
as 13-35899
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOEL CHRISTOPHER HOLMES
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT RUSSELL, Superintendent Washington Corrections Center, DANIEL SATTERBERG, KING COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
James Hinkley v. Eldon Vail, et al
as 13-35873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MARK HINKLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ELDON VAIL, SCOTT RUSSELL, KERRY ARLOW and others
Kurt Madsen v. Christine Gregoire, et al
as 13-35369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KURT MADSEN
Defendant:
CHRISTINE GREGOIRE
Defendant - Appellee:
BERNARD WARNER, SCOTT RUSSELL, PAT GLEBE and others
Larry Dunomes v. USDC-WAWTA
as 13-70705
:
In re: LARRY DARNELL DUNOMES
Petitioner:
LARRY DARNELL DUNOMES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, TACOMA
Real Party In Interest:
SCOTT RUSSELL
Bing Yu v. Scott Russell
as 12-35913
Petitioner - Appellant:
BING YU
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT RUSSELL, Superintendent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
