Cases 11 - 20 of 33
John Swain v. William Sullivan
as 20-71111
Petitioner:
JOHN SWAIN
Respondent:
WILLIAM JOE SULLIVAN, Warden
Frank Birch, Jr. v. State of Nevada, et al
as 20-15288
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, D. ROBERSON, A. BUEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK PATRICK BIRCH, Jr.
Max Butler v. Cynthia Swain
as 20-55112
Respondent / Appellee:
CYNTHIA SWAIN
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAX RAY BUTLER
Thomas Farrugia v. C. Swain
as 19-56081
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS RICHARD FARRUGIA
Respondent / Appellee:
C. SWAIN, Warden
Stevie Stevenson v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 19-55282
Defendant / Appellee:
R. MADDEN, Warden at Centinela State Prison, SCOTT KERNAN, Undersecretary/Secretary of CDCR, DENNIS BROWN, Associate Warden Business Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVIE J. STEVENSON, AKA Stevie J. Stevenson-Bey
Stevie Stevenson v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 18-56016
Petitioner:
STEVIE J. STEVENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, Secretary of CDCR, SCOTT KERNAN, Undersecretary/Secretary of CDCR, SHANNON SWAIN, Acting Superintendent of Education and others
Duane Belanus v. Leo Dutton, et al
as 18-35474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUANE RONALD BELANUS
Defendant - Appellee:
LEO DUTTON, HAWTHORNE, Officer, OFFICERS ON DUTY 11 JULY 2009 and others
David Troupe v. William Swain, et al
as 17-35516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID TROUPE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM A. SWAIN, DAN VAN OGLE, TIMOTHY TRASHER and others
Tyrone Swain v. Larry Small
as 16-56368
Petitioner - Appellant:
TYRONE FRANKLIN SWAIN
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY SMALL, Warden
Charles Daniel, Jr. v. L'Menreux, et al
as 14-35189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES DANIEL, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
L'MENREUX, Classification Counselor, Stafford Creek Correctional Center, KHAMARI CLAGGIOAN, Counselor, Stafford Creek Correctional Center, MCELRAVY, CPM, Stafford Creek Correctional Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
