Cases 11 - 20 of 163
Kenneth Shade, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 23-35587
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH H. SHADE
Plaintiff:
ERIC L. SHADE
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, EUGENE R. PELTOLA, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as Regional Director of the Alaska Region, Bureau of Indian Affairs and DEB HAALAND, individually and in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
Kenneth Shade, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 23-35569
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KENNETH H. SHADE
Plaintiff:
ERIC L. SHADE
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, EUGENE R. PELTOLA, Jr., individually and in his official capacity as Regional Director of the Alaska Region, Bureau of Indian Affairs and DEB HAALAND, individually and in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
ONDA, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35109
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, THERESA M. HANLEY, State Director, BLM Oregon/Washington, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
CAHILL RANCHES, INC., an Oregon corporation, MACKENZIE RANCH, LLC, LAIRD LAND COMPANY, LLC and others
ONDA, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35101
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, THERESA M. HANLEY, State Director, BLM Oregon/Washington, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
MACKENZIE RANCH, LLC, LAIRD LAND COMPANY, LLC, COW CREEK RANCH, INC. and others
Earth Island Institute v. Cicely Muldoon, et al
as 22-16483
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE, a non-profit corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
CICELY MULDOON, in her official capacity as Superintendent of Yosemite National Park, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of the Interior
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35701
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Washington Cattlemen's Association, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70194
Not Classified By Court:
In re: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCAITION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Petitioner:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Baker Ranches, Inc., et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-15846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BAKER RANCHES, INC., DAVID JOHN ELDRIDGE, RUTH ELDRIDGE, as Co-Trustees of the David John Eldridge and Ruth Eldridge Family Living Trust dated January 31, 2007 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SHAWN BENGE, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the National Park Service and others
Baker Ranches, Inc., et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 22-15765
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BAKER RANCHES, INC., DAVID JOHN ELDRIDGE, RUTH ELDRIDGE, as Co-Trustees of the David John Eldridge and Ruth Eldridge Family Living Trust dated January 31, 2007 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SHAWN BENGE, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the National Park Service and others
Samuel Kent v. Darryl LaCounte, et al
as 22-70013
Petitioner:
SAMUEL JAMES KENT
Respondent:
DARRYL LACOUNTE, Director of the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
