Cases 11 - 20 of 143
Drake Shelton v. Ur Jaddou
as 23-15965
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DRAKE ALDEN SHELTON
Defendant / Appellee:
UR MENDOZA JADDOU, Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35364
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55430
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-56068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ali Akbar Azimov, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 22-56034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALI AKBAR AZIMOV and IZATILLO GAFFAROV
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, under his title of Secretary of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds & Insurance Agency, Inc., et al v. USDHS, et al
as 22-16552
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GONZALES & GONZALES BONDS & INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., TOPPER BROKERAGE, INC., LEXINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD F. WOLF, Under the title of Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35773
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35702
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
