Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Shen Zhen New World I, LLC, et al v. Hyatt Franchising, LLC
as 17-55302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHEN ZHEN NEW WORLD I, LLC, a California limited liability company and SHEN ZHEN NEW WORLD INVESTMENT USA, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
HYATT FRANCHISING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Sino Clean Energy, Inc. v. Robert Seiden
as 17-15316
Debtor:
In the Matter of: SINO CLEAN ENERGY, INC.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SINO CLEAN ENERGY, INC., acting by and through BAOWEN REN, PENG ZHOU, WENJIE ZHANG, ZHIXIN JING, and PAUL CHUI; and HUIQIN CHEN, LI HAN, GUANGJON HUANG, XIAODONG JIANG, XUELING JING, YUFENG LI, HAICHO LI, LANYING LI, LIANG WANG, ZHEN WU, TING XTE, HESHUN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT W. SEIDEN, in his capacity as Receiver over Sino Clean Energy Inc.
Morris McQueen v. Zhen Huang, et al
as 16-56578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS MCQUEEN, a California Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
ZHEN GUANG HUANG, an individual, YUE PI YU, an individual, TOMMY Y WONG, an individual and others
Zhen Wang v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-72784
Petitioner:
ZHEN WANG
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Zhen Pan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-70981
Petitioner:
ZHEN PAN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Fei Wang, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-70463
Petitioner:
FEI WANG and JUAN ZHEN YE
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Liyin Zhen v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-73817
Petitioner:
LIYIN ZHEN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Fei Wang, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-73809
Petitioner:
FEI WANG and JUAN ZHEN YE
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Jie Zhen v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-71868
Petitioner:
JIE LI ZHEN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Zhen Pang v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-73553
Petitioner:
ZHEN PANG
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
