Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Jamilah Jefferson, et al
as 16-16657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMILAH A. JEFFERSON, OTIS JR. MCGEE and CITY OF OAKLAND
Edward Ray, Jr. v. A. Leal, et al
as 16-16482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
A. LEAL, Serial #8587P /Ind. and Off. cap, FRANCIS, #8365P and M. ZIEBRATH, #8281P
Edward Ray, Jr. v. John Deffenbaugh, et al
as 14-17026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DEFFENBAUGH, M.D., D.D.S., F. ZHANG, M.D., D.D.S., G. CHEUNG, M.D., D.D.S. and others
Edward Ray, Jr. v. CPS, et al
as 14-16222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES and NATHAN HOBBS
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Matthew Cate
as 14-15607
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Greg Schoo
as 14-55205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
GREG SCHOO, Lieutenant at Chino Institute for Men (CIM)
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Caesar Basa, et al
as 13-17393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CAESAR BASA, OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, CA and others
Edward Ray, Jr. v. USDC-CAOAK
as 13-71475
:
In re: EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Petitioner:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Edward Ray, Jr. v. G. Schoo
as 12-56885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
G. SCHOO, Correction Officer, (Rank Sgt.) in his his/her indicidual capacity also know as G A School
Edward Ray, Jr. v. USDC-CAOAK
as 12-73008
:
In re: EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Petitioner:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
