Cases 21 - 30 of 33
State of Alaska, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 17-35618
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MITCH ELLIS, in his official capacity as Chief of Refuges for the Alaska Region of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, JIM KURTH, in his official capacity as Acting Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, DENALI CITIZENS COUNCIL, WILDERNESS WATCH and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALASKA, GILBERT HUNTINGTON and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD T. WEST, Proposed Intervenor
National Mining Association v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 14-17350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee:
RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary of the Interior, S.M.R. JEWELL, Secretary of Interior, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
GRAND CANYON TRUST, SIERRA CLUB, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF MONTANA and others
National Parks Conservation, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 14-73102
Petitioner:
NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, SIERRA CLUB, GRAND CANYON TRUST and others
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and GINA MCCARTHY, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Phoenix Cement Co v. USEPA
as 13-73383
Amicus Curiae:
SIERRA CLUB, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION and TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
Petitioner:
PHOENIX CEMENT COMPANY, an enterprise division of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Drakes Bay Oyster Company, et al v. Environmental Action Committee, et al
as 13-15390
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DRAKES BAY OYSTER COMPANY and KEVIN LUNNY
Applicant-in-intervention - Appellant:
ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION COMMITTEE OF WEST MARIN, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
Defendant:
KENNETH L. SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, U.S. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and others
Wild Equity Institute, et al v. City and County of San Francis, et al
as 13-15046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILD EQUITY INSTITUTE, a non-profit corporation, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ED LEE, Mayor of the City and County of San Francisco and PHILIP GINSBURG, Director, City and County of San Francisco Recreation and Park Department
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC GOLF ALLIANCE
National Parks Conservation, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 12-73710
Petitioner:
NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER and SIERRA CLUB
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and LISA JACKSON, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Moapa Band of Paiute Indians, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 12-73388
Petitioner:
MOAPA BAND OF PAIUTE INDIANS, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION and SIERRA CLUB
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and LISA JACKSON, Administrator, U.S. EPA
Medical Advocates for Healthy, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 12-73386
Petitioner:
MEDICAL ADVOCATES FOR HEALTHY AIR, LATINOS UNITED FOR CLEAN AIR, SIERRA CLUB and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, LISA JACKSON, Administrator, U.S. EPA and JARED BLUMENFELD, Regional Administrator, Region IX, U.S. EPA
Piedmont Environmental Council, et al v. DOE, et al
as 08-71845
Petitioner:
PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION and others
Intervenor:
DESERT PROTECTION SOCIETY, CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, BACKCOUNTRY AGAINST DUMPS and others
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and SAMUEL W. BODMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
