Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 223
James Finias v. Renee Baker, et al
as 21-15948
Respondent / Appellee: RENEE BAKER, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES ERIC FINIAS
Michael Maxwell v. Renee Baker, et al
as 21-15911
Respondent / Appellee: RENEE BAKER, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL RAY MAXWELL
James Hundley v. Romeo Aranas, et al
as 21-15757
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES DERRICK HUNDLEY, AKA Jamee Deirdre Hundley
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID BEQUETTE, UTILIZATION REVIEW PANEL, KIM ADAMSON and others
Charles Maki v. Renee Baker
as 21-70814
Petitioner: CHARLES J. MAKI
Respondent: RENEE BAKER, Warden
Miguel Guitron v. Renee Baker, et al
as 21-15600
Respondent / Appellee: RENEE BAKER, Warden and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner / Appellant: MIGUEL JOSE GUITRON
Ubaldo Urbina-Maldonado v. Renee Baker, et al
as 21-15506
Respondent / Appellee: RENEE BAKER, Warden and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner / Appellant: UBALDO URBINA-MALDONADO
Eberto Bautista v. Rabi Roskamm, et al
as 21-15476
Defendant / Appellee: HENRY, Culinary MGR, RENEE BAKER, Warden, CHARLES DANIELS and others
Defendant: NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner: STEVEN BRAUNSTEIN, Proposed Intervenor and STEPHEN CIOLINO, Proposed Intervenor
Plaintiff / Appellant: EBERTO BAUTISTA
Darren Mack v. Renee Baker, et al
as 21-15410
Respondent / Appellee: RENEE BAKER, Warden, ADAM LAXALT and JAMES DZURENDA
Petitioner / Appellant: DARREN ROY MACK
Brendan Nasby v. State of Nevada, et al
as 21-15044
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRENDAN NASBY
Defendant / Appellee: HAROLD BYRNE, SAC #49, STATE OF NEVADA, TARA CARPENTER and others
John Fields v. Renee Baker, et al
as 20-17342
Respondent / Appellee: RENEE BAKER, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant: JOHN VERNON FIELDS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?