Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 170
In re: American Rivers, et al v. National Hydropower Associatio, et al
as 21-16960
Not Classified By Court: In re: CLEAN WATER ACT RULEMAKING
Plaintiff / Appellee: AMERICAN RIVERS, AMERICAN WHITEWATER, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Defendant / Appellee: ANDREW R. WHEELER and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION
Intervenor: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
In re: American Rivers, et al v. American Petroleum Institute, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-16958
Not Classified By Court: In re: CLEAN WATER ACT RULEMAKING
Plaintiff / Appellee: AMERICAN RIVERS, AMERICAN WHITEWATER, CALIFORNIA TROUT and others
Defendant: ANDREW R. WHEELER and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION
Intervenor: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and others
Pasqua Yaqui Tribe, et al v. Arizona Rock Products Associat, et al
as 21-16791
Plaintiff / Appellee: PASQUA YAQUI TRIBE, QUINAULT INDIAN NATION, FOND DU LAC BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA and others
Defendant: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, MICHAEL REGAN, EPA Administrator and TAYLOR N. FERRELL, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: ARIZONA ROCK PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL STONE, SAND, AND GRAVEL ASSOCIATION, ARIZONA CATTLE FEEDERS ASSOCIATION and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL SACKETT
Earth Island Institute, et al v. Michael Regan, et al
as 21-16671
Plaintiff / Appellee: EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, ROSEMARY AHTUANGARUAK and others
Defendant / Appellant: MICHAEL S. REGAN, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Center for Biological Diversit v. USEPA, et al
as 21-71306
Petitioner: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Respondent: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
CRLAF, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 21-71287
Petitioner: CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION, FARMWORKER ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA, INC., THE MICHAEL J. FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSONS RESEARCH and others
Respondent: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL REGAN, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Kern Oil & Refining Co. v. USEPA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-71246
Petitioner: KERN OIL & REFINING CO.
Respondent: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Northwest Envir. Advocates v. USEPA
as 21-71231
Not Classified By Court: In re: NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES
Petitioner: NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES
Respondent: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, MICHAEL REGAN, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and MICHELLE PIRZADEH, in her official capacity as Acting Regional Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10
Center for Biological Diversit v. USEPA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-71222
Petitioner: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Respondent: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, MICHAEL REGAN, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and DEBORAH JORDAN, Acting Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA Region 9
Center for Food Safety, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 21-71180
Petitioner: CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Respondent: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL REGAN, in his offical capacity as Administrator

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?