Cases 31 - 40 of 2,350
Shreves v. Godfrey, et al.
as 24-1692
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. SHREVES
Defendant:
DEMETRIC GODFREY, CRYSTAL THOMPSON, BRIAN GOOTKIN and others
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-1699
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, BARBARA CEGAVSKE and others
Shue v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1665
Petitioner:
JOSHUA CALEB SHUE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, CALVIN JOHNSON and JEREMY BEAN
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Richardson v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-1247
Plaintiff:
PATRICK L. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary and Director of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, individual and official capacity, JOSEPH BICK, Director of Correctional Health Care Services, individual and official capacity, JENNIFER BARRETTO, Director of Correctional Health Care Policy and Administration, individual and official capacity and others
United States of America v. Johnson
as 24-1228
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JUSTIN JOHNSON
Rust v. Fernandez, et al.
as 24-1098
Plaintiff:
CLARK RUST, independently, and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant:
ANTONIO FERNANDEZ, Sgt., ROBERT HOLDEN, C.O., AUBRIE MILLER and others
Johnson v. Nordstrom, Inc., et al.
as 24-1074
Plaintiff:
AMANDA JOHNSON
Defendant:
NORDSTROM, INC., Headquarters and UNKNOWN PARTIES, Julie and Will, Nordstrom, Customer Care
Van Huisen v. United States House of Representatives, et al.
as 24-898
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and MIKE JOHNSON, House Speaker
Harris v. Daniels, et al.
as 24-878
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS, BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR., MICHAEL MINEV and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
