Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Jack Koch v. Edward Alameida, Jr., et al
as 10-55697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK R. KOCH
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr., Director of C.D.C., SKELTON, Correctional Officer, MALDONADO, Correctional Officer and others
Victor Davis v. L. Scribner, et al
as 10-15971
Petitioner - Appellant:
VICTOR SAMUEL DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
L. E. SCRIBNER, Warden, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA
George Wright v. Steven Mayberg, et al
as 10-55568
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE WRIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN MAYBERG, Director, Department of Mental Health, CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, BOB DOYLE, Sheriff, Riverside County and others
Dean Drake v. Derral Adams, et al
as 10-15469
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEAN CLAY DRAKE
Respondent - Appellee:
DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden, California State Prison, Corcoran and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA
John Reed v. Clay, et al
as 10-15424
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN HENRY REED
Respondent - Appellee:
CLAY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Curtis Meeks v. T. Felker, et al
as 09-17904
Petitioner - Appellant:
CURTIS JAMELL MEEKS
Respondent - Appellee:
T. FELKER and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Lafayette Collins v. M. Kramer, et al
as 09-17873
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAFAYETTE COLLINS
Respondent - Appellee:
M. C. KRAMER and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Lino Ramos v. Tom Carey, et al
as 09-17663
Petitioner - Appellant:
LINO RAMOS
Respondent - Appellee:
TOM L. CAREY and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA
James Hood v. John Ratelle, et al
as 09-56873
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES NEWMAN HOOD
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN RATELLE, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Miguel Garza v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 09-17517
Petitioner - Appellant:
MIGUEL GARZA
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
