Cases 31 - 40 of 216
Jeffrey Phillips, et al v. Pilgrim Creek Estates Homeowne, et al
as 20-56144
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES, 1 through 20, inclusive and PILGRIM CREEK ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY PHILLIPS
Plaintiff:
JUNE PHILLIPS
O. L. v. USDC-CALA
as 20-72968
Not Classified By Court:
JUNE CHUNG, In re: O. L., ALEX VILLANUEVA and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Petitioner:
O. L.
Korey Aarstad, et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 20-35805
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SCOTT A. ALBERT, JOEL B. HEFTY, KENNETH L. DRAKE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation and JOHN SWING
Christopher Lull, et al v. County of Sacramento, et al
as 20-16599
Defendant / Appellee:
CYNDI LEE, JUNE POWELLS-MAYS, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO REVENUE RECOVERY DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AUTOTEK, INC. and CHRISTOPHER LULL
O. L. v. City of El Monte, et al
as 20-55785
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN THORP, CITY OF EL MONTE, JUNE CHUNG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
O. L.
June Domino v. California Correctional Health, et al
as 20-16328
Defendant / Appellee:
AFSCME LOCAL 2620 and CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUNE M. DOMINO
Michael Lawwrence Connel, Esq.In re: Michael Lawwrence Connel, Esq.
as 20-80090
Respondent:
In re: MICHAEL CONNELL, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: June 24, 1993
Jennifer Leigh Rocco, Esq.In re: Jennifer Leigh Rocco, Esq.
as 20-80091
Respondent:
In re: JENNIFER ROCCO, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: June 26, 2000
In re: Randall James Lanham, Esq.
as 20-80094
Respondent:
In re: RANDALL JAMES LANHAM, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: June 15, 1993
June Domino v. California Correctional Health, et al
as 20-16156
Defendant / Appellee:
AFSCME LOCAL 2620 and CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUNE M. DOMINO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
