Cases 41 - 50 of 366
Katherine Blumenkron, et al v. Multnomah County, et al
as 21-35987
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE BLUMENKRON, DAVID BLUMENKRON and SPRINGVILLE INVESTORS, LLC, a limited liability company
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ZAHLER
Defendant / Appellee:
MULTNOMAH COUNTY, ANYELEY HALLOVA, in their official capacities as a member of the Land Conservation and Development Commission, ROBIN MCARTHUR and others
Emmanuel Phillips v. Stuart Sherman, et al
as 21-56058
Petitioner / Appellant:
EMMANUEL PHILLIPS
Respondent / Appellee:
STUART SHERMAN, Warden and XAVIER BECERRA, The Attorney General of the State of California
Stephen Hill, et al v. City of Fountain Valley, et al
as 21-55867
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN DOUGLAS HILL, TERESA ANN HILL, BENJAMIN HILL, as guardian ad litem for his minor children C.H. and A.H. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY, STUART R. CHASE, GANNON P. KELLY and others
Defendant:
DOES, 1-10, inclusive
Barbara Robinson v. State of California
as 21-55807
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARBARA STUART ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Barbara Robinson v. USA
as 21-55794
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARBARA STUART ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
James Jackson v. R. Nelson, et al
as 21-35562
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES D. JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
R. NELSON, CO, R. A. YOUNG, Capt., WANONS, Cpl. and others
Barbara Robinson v. State of California
as 21-55715
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARBARA STUART ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Timmy Sullivan v. Stuart Sherman
as 21-55676
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMMY STEPHON SULLIVAN
Respondent / Appellee:
STUART SHERMAN, Warden
Larry Banks v. Stuart Sherman
as 21-15965
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY BANKS
Respondent / Appellee:
STUART SHERMAN, Warden
Jeff Zhang v. Stuart Sherman
as 21-55493
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEFF BAOLIANG ZHANG, Ph.D
Respondent / Appellee:
STUART SHERMAN, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
