Cases 41 - 50 of 81
R. Acosta, et al v. Seward Ship's Drydock, Inc.
as 18-71216
Petitioner:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, SECRETARY OF LABOR and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Respondent:
SEWARD SHIP'S DRYDOCK, INC.
State of California, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 18-15255
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF DELAWARE, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor and others
Oscar Ruiz v. National Steel & Shipbuilding, et al
as 17-73223
Petitioner:
OSCAR RUIZ
Respondent:
NATIONAL STEEL & SHIPBUILDING COMPANY, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Global Linguist Solutions, LLC, et al v. Steven Herfi, et al
as 17-72535
Petitioner:
GLOBAL LINGUIST SOLUTIONS, LLC and ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
STEVEN HERFI and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Global Linguist Solutions, LLC, et al v. Steven Herfi, et al
as 17-72535
Petitioner:
GLOBAL LINGUIST SOLUTIONS, LLC and ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
STEVEN HERFI and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Global Linguist Solutions, LLC, et al v. Abdulraouf Abdelmeged, et al
as 17-72516
Petitioner:
GLOBAL LINGUIST SOLUTIONS, LLC and ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
ABDULRAOUF ABDELMEGED and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
BNSF Railway Company v. USDOL, et al
as 17-71854
Petitioner:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Barnard Construction Company, v. USDOL
as 17-71838
Petitioner:
BARNARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Randall Pittman v. Adminstrative Review Board, et al
as 17-71393
Petitioner:
RANDALL PITTMAN
Respondent:
ADMINSTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
