Cases 41 - 50 of 6,298
Rossi, et al. v. Becker, et al.
as 24-2565
Petitioner:
STEPHEN ROSSI, KIM STEVENSON and HOWARD TARLOW
Respondent:
GREG W. BECKER, DANIEL J. BECK, KAREN HON and others
Human Rights Defense Center, Inc. v. Uttecht, et al.
as 24-2552
Plaintiff:
HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER, INC.
Defendant:
JEFFERY ALFRED UTTECHT, Superintendent of Coyote Ridge Corrections Center of the Washington Department of Corrections in his individual and official capacities and JOHN D. TURNER, Mailroom Sergeant of Coyote Ridge Corrections Center in his individual and official capacities
BGH Holdings, LLC, et al. v. D. L. Evans Bank
as 24-2540
Plaintiff:
BGH HOLDINGS, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, GINGER ATHERTON and HENRY DEAN, and their marital community
Defendant:
D. L. EVANS BANK
Carroll v. Pitkonen, et al.
as 24-2522
Plaintiff:
CURTIS-GENE CARROLL, Aggrieved Plaintiff, Sui Juris
Defendant:
TUYET PITKONEN, MARK HODGSON, Attorney, SHAUN HUPPERT, Attorney and others
Healy v. Milliman, Inc.
as 24-2501
Petitioner:
JAMES HEALY
Respondent:
MILLIMAN, INC., d/b/a Intelliscript
Corbray v. Bennett
as 24-2504
Petitioner:
DENNIS D CORBRAY and Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Diaz v. Moore, et al.
as 24-2512
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
Rabb v. Figueroa, et al.
as 24-2452
Plaintiff:
DAMEN D. RABB
Defendant:
ESTEVEN FIGUEROA, Correctional Officer and EMMANUEL CHAVEZ, Correctional Officer
D' Souza v. City of San Clemente, et al.
as 24-2423
Plaintiff:
FREDA PHILOMENA D' SOUZA
Defendant:
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, a municipal corporation, ADAM ATAMIAN and ANTHONY KURTZ
Johnson v. Holms, et al.
as 24-2402
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
Sgt D HOLMS, CULLINA, Correctional Officer, BINKO, Correctional Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
