Cases 51 - 60 of 103
City of Santa Monica v. USA, et al
as 14-55583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION and MICHAEL P. HUERTA, in his Official Capacity as Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-55340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Gladden v. USDOT, et al
as 13-74171
Petitioner:
DAVID GARY GLADDEN
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION and FREDERICK E. TILTON
Craig Simmons v. FAA
as 13-73881
Petitioner:
CRAIG L. SIMMONS
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
David Haeg v. Michael Huerta
as 13-73737
Petitioner:
DAVID S. HAEG
Respondent:
MICHAEL P. HUERTA, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration
County of Tompkins, et al v. FAA, et al
as 13-71518
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF TOMPKINS, DOUGLAS C. LEWIS, MICHAEL C. ATWOOD and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION and MICHAEL P. HUERTA
Kenneth Paskar, et al v. FAA, et al
as 13-71514
Petitioner:
KENNETH D. PASKAR and FRIENDS OF LAGUARDIA AIRPORT, INC.
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, MICHAEL P. HUERTA and RAY LAHOOD, Secretary, United States Department of Transportation
City of San Diego v. FAA, et al
as 13-71442
Petitioner:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a charter city organized and existing under the Constitution of the State of California
Respondent:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION and MICHAEL P. HUERTA
Texas A&M University v. Michael Huerta, et al
as 13-71414
Petitioner:
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY, A Texas Institution of Higher Learning
Respondent:
MICHAEL P. HUERTA and FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Mohave County Airport Authorit v. Michael Huerta, et al
as 13-71423
Petitioner:
MOHAVE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY, INC.
Respondent:
MICHAEL P. HUERTA and FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
