Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ruth Camel, Estate v. Shirley Weber, et al
as 22-16068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUTH CAMEL ESTATE and RUTH CAMEL, ESTATE
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY NASH WEBER, JUAN TORRES, LEE GARVEY and others
Vernal Garvey v. State of Washington
as 20-35232
Petitioner / Appellant:
VERNAL GEORGE GARVEY
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
John Roettgen v. D. Paramo, et al
as 19-55172
Defendant / Appellee:
M. CURTIS, Correctional Officer, SEIBEL, Chief Deputy Warden, F. PINTADO, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DAVID ROETTGEN
Lisa Garvey v. Kmart Corporation
as 13-15814
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LISA GARVEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
KMART CORPORATION
Lisa Garvey v. Kmart Corporation
as 13-15797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA GARVEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
KMART CORPORATION
Lisa Garvey v. Kmart Corporation
as 13-15117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA GARVEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
KMART CORPORATION
Lisa Garvey v. Kmart Corporation
as 12-80149
Plaintiff - Respondent:
LISA GARVEY
Defendant - Petitioner:
KMART CORPORATION
In re: Garvey M. Bigger
as 11-80306
Respondent:
In re: GARVEY M. BIGGERS, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: October 29, 1985
Jesus Barron v. Department of Homeland Securit, et al
as 10-55386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESUS RODRIGUEZ BARRON, AKA Jessie
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, FKA United States Department of Justice, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Ex Rel., United States Department of Justice, Home Land Security Administration, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Federal Express Inc. v. Paul Bibo, et al
as 09-80073
Petitioner:
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC., a Delaware Corporation
Respondent:
PAUL BIBO, an individual, GEORGIA SHIELDS, an individual, ALEX GALVEZ, an individual and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
