Cases 1 - 10 of 228
Keenan Wilkins v. USDC-SAC
as 23-70177
Not Classified By Court:
In re: KEENAN G. WILKINS, PAUL GONZALEZ, S. PULLEY and others
Petitioner:
KEENAN G. WILKINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Willie Grant v. Gary Swarthout, et al
as 22-55291
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIE ULYSESS GRANT
Respondent / Appellee:
GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden, KAMALA D. HARRIS and RICK HILL, Warden
Paul Johnson v. J. Beard, et al
as 21-16846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director/Secretary of CDCR, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, Warden of HDSP, J. PRICE, Warden, DVI and others
Jonathan Marvin v. Gary Swarthout
as 21-16573
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONATHAN CARROLL MARVIN
Respondent / Appellee:
GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden
Paul Johnson v. J. Beard, et al
as 21-16368
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director/Secretary of CDCR, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, Warden of HDSP, J. PRICE, Warden, DVI and others
Paul Johnson v. D. Runnels, et al
as 21-15888
Defendant / Appellee:
Y. P. CHEN, MD at CSP-SOL, BINOYE NAKU, L. B. BROWN, Jr., MD at CDCR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Kenneth Hill v. Gary Swarthout, et al
as 20-16974
Defendant / Appellee:
R. W. CAPPEL, Associate Warden, L. MEJORADO, GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH HILL
Paul Johnson v. Mahmoud, et al
as 20-16498
Defendant:
J. PRICE, N. ACQUVA, F. KREITLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
G. SWARTHOUT, Y. P. CHEN, MAHMOUD, MD at CSP-SOL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Daniel Borden, Sr. v. Gary Swarthout
as 20-15843
Respondent / Appellee:
GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL F. BORDEN, Sr.
Jonathan Marvin v. Gary Swarthout
as 19-17117
Respondent / Appellee:
GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONATHAN CARROLL MARVIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
