Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Adobe Systems, Inc., et al v. USDC-CASJ
as 14-72745
:
In re: ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., APPLE INC., GOOGLE INC. and others
Petitioner:
ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., APPLE INC., GOOGLE INC. and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE
Real Party In Interest:
SIDDHARTH HARIHARAN, BRANDON MARSHALL, MICHAEL DEVINE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-16528
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Siddharth Hariharan, et al v. Adobe Systems, Inc., et al
as 13-80223
Plaintiff - Respondent:
SIDDHARTH HARIHARAN, BRANDON MARSHALL, MICHAEL DEVINE and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., APPLE INC., GOOGLE INC. and others
Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Joshua Christenson, et al
as 12-17371
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
JOSHUA CHRISTENSON, an individual, DBA www.softwaresurplus.com and SOFTWARE SUPLUS, INC.
Third-party-defendant:
SOFTWARE PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION, DBA Software Information Industry Association
Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Anthony Kornrumpf, et al
as 12-16616
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY KORNRUMPF, AKA Tony Kornrumpf and HOOPES ENTERPRISE, LLC
Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Anthony Kornrumpf, et al
as 12-15341
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY KORNRUMPF, AKA Tony Kornrumpf and HOOPES ENTERPRISE, LLC
Xilinx, Inc., et al v. CIR
as 06-74246
Petitioner - Appellee:
XILINX, INC., AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Respondent - Appellant:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Amicus Curiae:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ALTERA CORPORATION, FORMER U.S. TREASURY AND INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE OFFICIALS and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
APPLE, INC., ALTERA CORPORATION, CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
