Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Y. F. C.-G. v. Garland
as 24-5392
Petitioner:
Y. F. C.-G.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
C. G. v. Redding Christian School
as 20-15712
Defendant / Appellee:
REDDING CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
C. G., by and through his Guardian ad Litem Wendy Graham
Larry Rosser v. H. Sanchez, et al
as 13-55610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY ROSSER
Defendant - Appellee:
H. SANCHEZ, Correctional Officer, E. APODACA, Correctional Officer, R. CROMBIE, Correctional Officer and others
Larry Rosser v. H. Sanchez, et al
as 11-80294
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
LARRY ROSSER
Defendant - Respondent:
H. SANCHEZ, Correctional Officer, E. APODACA, Correctional Officer, R. CROMBIE, Correctional Officer and others
C&G Farms, Inc. v. Kenton Shank, et al
as 10-57027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
C&G FARMS, INC., a California Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
SALLY COLEMAN, an individual, CELTIC CAPITOL CORPORATION, a California corporation, COMMERCEWEST BANK, a California corporation and others
Eugene Hamilton v. L. Robles, et al
as 09-55082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
L. ROBLES, Medical Technical Assistant, M. MCNAIR, K. SAIZER and others
Karluk Mayweathers v. J. Woodford, et al
as 08-56835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARLUK MAYWEATHERS, AKA Karluk Khan Mayweathers
Defendant - Appellee:
J S WOODFORD, Director of Corrections, N GRANNIS, Chief, Inmate Appeals, S RYAN, Acting Warden and others
Marella v. Terhune, et al
as 07-55006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD MICHAEL MARELLA
Defendant - Appellee:
C. A. TERHUNE, Director of the California Department of Corrections, R M HOUSTON, Chief Deputy Warden, Calipatria and C G BUTLER, Captain, Calipatria; DENISE EDWARDS, Appeals Coordinator, CCII, Calipatria; HARRIET FASOLO, Appeals Coordinator, CCII, Calipatria; A TERHUNE, Correctional Counselor II, (A) Calipatria State Prison, Facility"B"; M K ORMAND, Correctional Counsel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
