Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Steve Marquez v. C. Rodriguez, et al
as 21-55981
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STEVE MARQUEZ
Defendant / Appellant:
C. RODRIGUEZ, Correctional Officer at M.C.C. Federal Prison and L. KELLY, Correctional Officer at M.C.C. Federal Prison
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BUREAU OF PRISONS, DAVID L. YOUNG, Warden of M.C.C. Federal Prison and others
David Young v. Mercury Casualty Company
as 19-16330
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID BRIGHAM YOUNG
Defendant / Appellant:
MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY
David Young, et al v. Mercury Casualty Company
as 19-16223
Defendant / Appellee:
MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BRIGHAM YOUNG
Not Yet Classified:
BRIDGE FUNDS, LLC
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. ANSARA
Felipe Gutierrez-Chic v. William Barr, et al
as 19-55625
Petitioner / Appellant:
FELIPE GUTIERREZ-CHIC
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID L. YOUNG, Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center San Diego, STEVEN C. STAFFORD, U.S. Marshal, Southern District of California, DONALD WASHINGTON, Director, United States Marshals Service and others
Dolores Mandrigues, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
as 13-17234
:
In re: WACHOVIA CORP. "PICK-A-PAYMENT" MORTGAGE MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOLORES MANDRIGUES, JUANITA JONES, AL F. MINYEN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, successor to by merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, NA, FKA Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, FKA World Savings Bank, FSB
Real-party-in-interest - Appellee:
CHAN PHARN, CHRISTINA ZAKO, PAUL MCDERMED and others
David Young v. Brian Williams, et al
as 12-16597
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID HENRY YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
David Young v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 08-17722
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID HENRY YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT W. NEVEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
