Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Donald Trump, et al v. USDC-WAWSE
as 20-72793
Petitioner: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Not Classified By Court: CATHRINE SCHMID, PHILLIP STEPHENS, GENDER JUSTICE LEAGUE and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Donald Trump, et al v. USDC-WAWSE
as 20-70365
Petitioner: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Not Classified By Court: CATHRINE SCHMID, PHILLIP STEPHENS, GENDER JUSTICE LEAGUE and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Donald Trump, et al v. USDC-WAWSE
as 18-72159
: In re: DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES MATTIS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense and others
Petitioner: DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES MATTIS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Real Party In Interest: RYAN KARNOSKI, CATHRINE SCHMID, D.L. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-35347
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-36009
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?