Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Jaques Fearence v. Brenda Cash
as 22-55679
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAQUES FEARENCE
Respondent / Appellee:
BRENDA M. CASH, Warden
Fearence v. Benavidez
as 22-1011
Petitioner:
JAQUES OMAR FEARENCE
Respondent:
JENNIFER BENAVIDEZ, WARDEN
Fearence v. Benavidez
as 22-546
Petitioner:
JAQUES OMAR FEARENCE
Respondent:
JENNIFER BENAVIDEZ, WARDEN
Jaques Fearence v. Brenda Cash
as 22-55108
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAQUES FEARENCE
Respondent / Appellee:
BRENDA M. CASH, Warden
Jaques Fearence v. Brenda Cash
as 21-56162
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAQUES FEARENCE
Respondent / Appellee:
BRENDA M. CASH, Warden
Carlos Salazar-Jaque v. William Barr
as 20-73385
Petitioner:
CARLOS ODILON SALAZAR-JAQUE
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Jaques Fearence v. E. Frances, et al
as 13-55322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAQUES FEARENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
E. FRANCES, in individual capacity and as Nurse Practitioner in official capacity, J. FITTER, in individual capacity and as Medical Doctor staff physician in official capacity, A. ADAMS, in individual capacity and as Chieff Physician and Surgeon in official capacity and others
Jaques Fearence v. J. Bringas, et al
as 13-55055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAQUES FEARENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
J. BRINGAS, incividual and as Dietition/Food Administrator I, official capacity, P. SHANK, individual and as Coorectional Health Services Administrator II, official capacity and T. BELAVICH, individual and as Chief Executive Officer, official capacity
Jaques Fearence v. P. Finander, et al
as 12-56519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAQUES FEARENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
P. FINANDER, individual, T. BELAVICH, individual, L. D. ZAMORA, individual and others
Jaques Fearence v. J. De La Torre, et al
as 12-56381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAQUES FEARENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
W. MARTINEZ, individual, J. DE LA TORRE, individual and S. KUHN, Individual
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
