Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Monlejo-Juan, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3246
Petitioner:
JUANA MONLEJO-JUAN, NOE LOPEZ-MONLEJO and DAVID JUAN LOPEZ-MONLEJO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Domingo Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2769
Petitioner:
JUANA DOMINGO RAMOS, ADRIANA ELIZABETH JUAN DOMINGO, FIDEL ESTUARDO JUAN DOMINGO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fernando Lopez-Pojoy v. William Barr
as 20-71814
Petitioner:
FERNANDO JUAN LOPEZ-POJOY, AKA Fernando Juan Pojoy, AKA Fernando Juan Pojoy-Lopez
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Juan Lopez-Sanchez v. William Barr
as 20-70591
Petitioner:
JUAN LOPEZ-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Christian Najera v. Kimberly Hendrix, et al
as 20-55044
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HENDRIX, JUAN LOPEZ and EARNEST GREEN, President
Defendant:
SRDC, COURT PERSONAL AND DECISIONS, LA CITY COURT JUDGES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTIAN NAJERA
USA v. Juan Lopez-Gonzalez
as 19-10385
Defendant / Appellee:
JUAN LOPEZ-GONZALEZ, AKA Jose Fidencio Lopez, AKA Juan Fidencion, AKA Jose Gonzalez-Vega, AKA Jose Lopez-Gonzales
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Luke Dumas v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 19-56170
Defendant / Appellee:
COMPTON AIRPORT, CITY OF SANTA MONICA, PATRICK H. WEST, individual and City Manager, official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUKE DUMAS
Joaquin Roces, et al v. Reno Housing Authority
as 18-16442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOAQUIN ROCES, JUDITH LOPEZ, JUAN LOPEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RENO HOUSING AUTHORITY
Joaquin Roces, et al v. Reno Housing Authority
as 18-15525
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOAQUIN ROCES, JUDITH LOPEZ, JUAN LOPEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RENO HOUSING AUTHORITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
