Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Samuel Anderson v. Dorothy Swingler, et al
as 17-15952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DOROTHY SWINGLER, Chief Medical Officer and BONNIE LEE, Chief Physician and Surgeon
Defendant:
T. KIMURA-YIP, Associate Director, California Prison Health Care, J. WALKER, Chief, Office of Third Level Appeals - Health Care, N. WARREN, Chief (Acting) Office of Third Level Appeals - Health Care and others
Samuel Anderson v. Dorothy Swingler, et al
as 17-15831
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAMUEL ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellant:
DOROTHY SWINGLER, Chief Medical Officer and BONNIE LEE, Chief Physician and Surgeon
Defendant:
T. KIMURA-YIP, Associate Director, California Prison Health Care, J. WALKER, Chief, Office of Third Level Appeals - Health Care, N. WARREN, Chief (Acting) Office of Third Level Appeals - Health Care and others
Vincent Solomon v. Tate, et al
as 14-16673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT U. SOLOMON
Defendant - Appellee:
TATE, A. JOAQUIN, S. SHEISHA and others
Vincent Callender v. M. Castillo, et al
as 14-15411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT A. CALLENDER
Defendant - Appellee:
M. CASTILLO, M.D., LANDSDALE J. PETERS, P.A., GODWIN UGWUEZE, Physician, MD, & Surgeon and others
Samuel Anderson v. USDC-SAC
as 13-72893
:
In re: SAMUEL ANDERSON
Petitioner:
SAMUEL ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
J. CLARK KELSO, Receiver, T. KIMURA-YIP, Associate Director, California Prison Health Care, J. WALKER, Chief, Office of Third Level Appeals - Health Care and others
Samuel Anderson v. USDC-SAC
as 13-71813
:
In re: SAMUEL ANDERSON
Petitioner:
SAMUEL ANDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
J. CLARK KELSO, Receiver, T. KIMURA-YIP, Associate Director, California Prison Health Care, J. WALKER, Chief, Office of Third Level Appeals - Health Care and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
