Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55957
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Christine Alire, et al v. The Gap, Inc., et al
as 21-55752
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTINE ALIRE
Plaintiff:
SHADI HAYDEN, JERRY HO, WILLIAM HANNUM and others
Defendant / Appellant:
THE GAP, INC.
Defendant:
THE RETAIL EQUATION, INC., SEPHORA USA, INC., ADVANCE AUTO PARTS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-16512
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-56335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-17053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daniel Reyes, et al v. Cover-All Inc., et al
as 11-80082
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DANIEL REYES, RODOLFO CORTES, JERRY BURCH and others
Defendant - Respondent:
COVER-ALL INC., HOME DEPOT INC. and HOME DEPOT USA INC.
Ronnie Burns v. The Home Depot, Inc.
as 10-56306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE BURNS, an Individual
Defendant - Appellee:
THE HOME DEPOT, INC., a California Corporation
Andrew Shalaby, et al v. Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., et al
as 09-56331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW W. SHALABY and SONIA DUNN-RUIZ
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellee:
NEWELL RUBBERMAID, INC., THE HOME DEPOT, INC., IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY, INC. and others
Cross-defendant - Appellee:
WESTERN INDUSTRIES, INC. and WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES
Andrea Spiegler, et al v. Home Depot USA Inc, et al
as 08-55782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREA SPIEGLER, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated and PNINA BOUSKILA, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similary Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
HOME DEPOT USA, INC, THE HOME DEPOT, INC, EXPO DESIGN CENTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
