Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 899
Rogers v. Taylor, et al.
as 24-6695
Defendant: SHERGILL, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, EDWARD NORMAN, Food Services Supervisor for King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, S. CHARLESTON, Corrections Program Specialist and others
Plaintiff: RAY CLARENCE ROGERS
Rogers v. Reichard, et al.
as 24-6701
Defendant: M. DRAKE, Sergeant, King County Jail, SEATTLE AND KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, CHU, Corrections Officer, King County Jail and others
Plaintiff: RAY CLARENCE ROGERS
Rossi, et al. v. Becker, et al.
as 24-6600
Defendant: JEFFREY N. MAGGIONCALDA, SCALE VENTURE PARTNERS, KPMG LLP and others
Plaintiff: STEPHEN ROSSI, KIM STEVENSON and HOWARD TARLOW
Merkley, et al. v. Idaho Board of Corrections
as 24-6547
Plaintiff: ROGER EHLER, STEPHEN ULLRICH, GEORGE CRIDER and others
Defendant: IDAHO BOARD OF CORRECTIONS
Greer v. Wormuth, et al.
as 24-6425
Plaintiff: ROGER E. GREER
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Secretary, Department of the Army
Lyons v. Le Beau, et al.
as 24-6339
Defendant: C. BULLEN, SERGEANT, No. 14640 Supervisor, P. ROGERS, SERGEANT, No. 16174 Supervisor, TIMOTHY CORAN and others
Plaintiff: JOSHUA L. LYONS
Avery, et al. v. TekSystems, Inc.
as 24-5810
Defendant: TEKSYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff: JILL UNVERFERTH, KRISTY CAMILLERI, PHOEBE ROGERS and others
Misuraca v. Loke, et al.
as 24-5707
Defendant: BRENNA COLLINS, Amy Braeminger, KENIA SALVESEN and others
Plaintiff: AIRIAN JOVAN MISURACA
Parker v. County of Riverside, et al.
as 24-5602
Defendant: SEAN LAFFERTY, individually and in his official capacity, TRICIA FRANSDAL, individually and in her official capacity, JEFFREY VAN WAGENEN, individually and others
Plaintiff: ROGER WAYNE PARKER
Ullrich, et al. v. Idaho Board of Corrections
as 24-5574
Plaintiff: WAYNE D. MERKLEY, GEORGE CRIDER, STEPHEN ULLRICH and others
Defendant: IDAHO BOARD OF CORRECTIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?