Cases 41 - 50 of 7,196
Genene Frank v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
Genene Frank
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Audrey Peters v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02895
Plaintiff:
Audrey Peters
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ana Lisette Tillman v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
Ana Lisette Tillman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Camden Rose Billin v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01868
Plaintiff:
Camden Rose Billin
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Amy Nielsen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv02863
Plaintiff:
Amy Nielsen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Maria Eugenia Rodriguez v. Martin J. O Malley
as 2:2024cv02723
Plaintiff:
Maria Eugenia Rodriguez
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Angelo T. Gullotti v. Martin J. O Malley
as 2:2024cv02744
Plaintiff:
Angelo T. Gullotti
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robyn Ann Goodman v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Robyn Ann Goodman
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Joel Frederick Lang v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Joel Frederick Lang
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jon Mark La Chance v. Martin J O Malley
as 8:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Jon Mark La Chance
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
