Cases 111 - 120 of 666
Fermin Vela v. Nabors Completion and Production Services Co.
as 2:2022cv01147
Petitioner:
Fermin Vela
Respondent:
NABORS COMPLETION & PRODUCTION SERVICES CO., n/k/a C&J WELL SERVICES, INC., Nabors Completion and Production Services Co and C and J Well Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Zhongtie Dacheng (Zhuhai) Investment Management Co Ltd v. Yan
as 8:2022cv00461
Petitioner:
Zhongtie Dacheng (Zhuhai) Investment Management Co Ltd
Respondent:
Jinggang Yan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. Zackary Berry
as 8:2022cv00374
Petitioner:
Schneider National Carriers, Inc.
Respondent:
Zackary Berry
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
OptumRX Inc. v. TADEK Inc.
as 8:2022cv00706
Petitioner:
OptumRX Inc.
Respondent:
TADEK Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Microchip Technology Inc. v. Cortus S.A.S
as 2:2022cv01047
Petitioner:
Microchip Technology Inc.
Respondent:
Cortus S.A.S
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
OptumRX Inc. v. 7th ELM Drug
as 8:2022cv00529
Petitioner:
OptumRX Inc.
Respondent:
7TH ELM DRUG
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
OptumRX Inc. v. Acjk Inc.
as 8:2022cv00545
Petitioner:
OptumRX Inc.
Respondent:
Acjk Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
OptumRX Inc. v. PrInc.eville Pharmacy LLC
as 8:2022cv00631
Petitioner:
OptumRX Inc.
Respondent:
PrInc.eville Pharmacy LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
OptumRX Inc. v. 30 A Innovations LLC
as 8:2022cv00591
Petitioner:
OptumRX Inc.
Respondent:
30 A INNOVATIONS LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
OptumRX Inc. v. Anbar Inc
as 8:2022cv00665
Petitioner:
OptumRX Inc.
Respondent:
Anbar Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
