Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Longitude Licensing Limited v. Dell Technologies, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv02312
Plaintiff:
LONGITUDE LICENSING LIMITED
Defendant:
Dell Technologies, Inc. and Dell, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Proxyconn, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 8:2016cv01102
Defendant:
Acer America Corporation, Dell Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company and others
Plaintiff:
Proxyconn, Inc.
Limestone Memory Systems LLC v. Dell Inc.
as 8:2015cv00648
Defendant:
Dell Inc.
Plaintiff:
Limestone Memory Systems LLC
LIMESTONE MEMORY SYSTEMS LLC, a California Limited Liability Company v. MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., a Delaware Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv01151
Defendant:
ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, a California Corporation, DELL INC., a Delaware Corporation, HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
LIMESTONE MEMORY SYSTEMS LLC, a California Limited Liability Company
Limestone Memory Systems LLC v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv00278
Defendant:
Acer America Corporation, Dell Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company and others
Plaintiff:
Limestone Memory Systems LLC
SOTA Semiconductor LLC v. Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv01693
Defendant:
Belkin International, Inc., Dell Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company and others
Plaintiff:
SOTA Semiconductor LLC
Proxyconn Inc v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 8:2012cv00889
Counter Claimant:
Acer America Corporation, Dell Inc, Hewlett-Packard Company and others
Defendant:
Acer America Corporation, Dell Inc, Hewlett-Packard Company and others
Counter Defendant:
Proxyconn Inc, Proxyconn Inc, Proxyconn Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Proxyconn Inc
Golden Bridge Technology Inc v. Apple Inc et al
as 2:2012cv04014
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc, Apple Inc, Barnes and Noble Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
Golden Bridge Technology Inc
Plaintiff:
Golden Bridge Technology Inc
Counter Claimant:
Hewlett-Packard Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.