Cases 51 - 60 of 371
Louis Morales et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 2:2017cv00454
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Cruz and Louis Morales
Defendant:
Does, JPMC Specialty Mortgage LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Rubaldo Valdez et al v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00135
Defendant:
Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA and Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Plaintiff:
Clara Valdez and Rubaldo Valdez
Haleh Ziaiematin v. Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00022
Defendant:
Bear Stearns Residential Mortgage Corporation, Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA and others
Plaintiff:
Haleh Ziaiematin
Jonathan Startz v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 2:2016cv09627
Defendant:
Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and Quality Loan Service Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Startz
Danilo Real et al v. James Dimon et al
as 8:2016cv02270
Plaintiff:
Laurel Bauer and Danilo Isaac Real
Defendant:
James Dimon, Clement Durkin, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Harutyun Arthur Ambarthian
as 2:2016cv09107
Defendant:
Harutyun Arthur Ambarthian
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Niki Alexander Shetty v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2016cv08986
Defendant:
All Persons Unknown Claiming, Does and JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Niki Alexander Shetty
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association v. Marie S. Debello et al
as 5:2016cv02427
Defendant:
Marie S. Debello and Does
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Martha C. Fernandez v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 8:2016cv02080
Defendant:
Does and JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Martha C. Fernandez
Isaac Gorden Powell v. Quality Loan Services et al
as 2:2016cv07811
Defendant:
Quality Loan Services, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Washington Mutual Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Powell and Isaac Gorden Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
