Cases 81 - 90 of 4,278
Gilbert v. Site Safe Traffic Safety and Signs
as 2:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Todd Gilbert
Defendant:
Site Safe Traffic Safety and Signs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Winiecki v. WFS Express, Inc.
as 2:2024at00366
Plaintiff:
Robert Winiecki
Defendant:
WFS Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Winiecki v. WFS Express, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00933
Plaintiff:
Robert Winiecki
Defendant:
WFS Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Kelly v. Banner Health et al
as 2:2024at00358
Plaintiff:
Vincent Kelly
Defendant:
Banner Health and BH Corporate Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hicks v. Utiliquest, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00911
Plaintiff:
Robert Hicks
Defendant:
Utiliquest, LLC and Dycom Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Kelly v. Banner Health et al
as 2:2024cv00920
Plaintiff:
Vincent Kelly
Defendant:
Banner Health and BH Corporate Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Mesquita v. California Ammonia Co. et al
as 2:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
Alex Mesquita
Defendant:
California Ammonia Co. Doing business as CALAMCO and David Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Saetern v. Airgas USA, LLC
as 2:2024at00317
Plaintiff:
Cheng Saetern
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Borba v. Western Refining Retail, LLC
as 1:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Cory Borba
Defendant:
Western Refining Retail, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Saetern v. Airgas USA, LLC
as 2:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Cheng Saetern
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
