Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pulbrook et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Taylor Steven Pulbrook, Martin Kolkin, Christian Adair Mays and others
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nguyen v. The United States
as 5:2022cv00948
Plaintiff:
Mai-Trang Thi Nguyen
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
May v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
as 3:2021cv08301
Plaintiff:
Leslie May
Defendant:
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nguyen v. Pelosi et al
as 5:2020cv08755
Defendant:
US Senator Mitch McConnell, Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell
Plaintiff:
Mai-Trang Thi Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Markley et al v. May Himmer, PLLC et al
as 5:2020cv08425
Plaintiff:
Dean Markley, Markley International, LTD and Dean Markley U.S.A.
Defendant:
May Himmer, PLLC, E. Joe May and Lynne A. Himmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dedal v. Covenant Aviation Security LLC et al
as 3:2019cv01842
Plaintiff:
May Dedal
Defendant:
PrimeFlight Aviation Services, Inc. and Covenant Aviation Security LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kwan v. Amtrak et al
as 3:2008cv05258
Plaintiff:
May Kwan
Defendant:
Amtrak, Amtrak and State of California
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shade et al v. Judicial Counsel of the State of California et al
as 4:2008cv02563
Plaintiff:
Ross S. Shade and Mary C. Shade
Defendant:
Judicial Counsel of the State of California, Ronald M. George, Marvin R. Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shade et al v. Judicial Counsel of the State of California et al
as 3:2008cv02563
Plaintiff:
Ross S. Shade and Mary C. Shade
Defendant:
Judicial Counsel of the State of California, Ronald M. George, Marvin R. Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
